Determiners: A Relational Perspective
نویسنده
چکیده
In this paper we examine from a semantic point of view a class of expressions variously referred to as determiners, quantifiers, or articles. Our treatment of the meaning of these expressions reflects an idea which has its origin in the work of Montague (1970), Lewis (1972), Geach (1972), and Cresswell (1973): determiners are to be interpreted as two-place relations between sets of individuals. This account, though valuable, is of course too general to produce any results of linguistic interest. For no assumption whatsoever is made concerning the content and structure of these binary relations. To remedy this, we shall suggest a number of principles restricting the range of admissible interpretations of natural language determiners. Next we examine some of the more important relational properties of determiners, provide alternative ways of characterizing several of these properties, and present a rather large class of non-existence results, many of which were first proved in van Benthem (1982). The significance of these results is that certain properties, and combinations of properties, are inconsistent with the principles that we shall adopt. By a determiner, semantically speaking, we mean a functor D which assigns to each universe E a binary relation DE between subsets of E. Familiar examples of determiners include all, no, some, and the three, and if we identify the determiner symbol with its interpretation, we have (for every universe E and every A,B E E)
منابع مشابه
Dream Telling in Group (Relational Perspective of Friedman)
This article is about dream telling in the group. Friedman as a psychoanalyst belives that telling a dream in group provide a fortune for all of the members to access intersubjectivity speace. he formulate perspective to react to a dream in three levels: Informative perspective, Formative perspective and Transformative perspective.
متن کاملSemantic Variation and Pleonastic Determiners: The Case of the Plural Definite Generic
This paper examines the status of so-called ‘pleonastic’ determiners, focusing on the plural definite generic common in Romance languages. It is noted that every language has generic or kind-denoting terms but such terms vary between bare and definite (rather than indefinite) forms across languages. Canonical and non-canonical uses of definite determiners are distinguished and language variatio...
متن کاملUniversals on natural language determiners from a PAC-learnability perspective
A classical conjecture in generative linguistics is that universal restrictions on determiners in Natural Language (e.g. monotonicity, invariance, and conservativity) serve the purpose of simplifying the language acquisition task. This paper formalizes this conjecture within the PAC-learnability framework.
متن کاملA Semantics for Nominal Comparatives
This work adopts the perspective of plural logic and measurement theory in order rst to focus on the microstructure of comparative determiners; and second, to derive the properties of comparative determiners as these are studied in Generalized Quantiier Theory, locus of the most sophisticated semantic analysis of natural language determiners. The work here appears to be the rst to examine compa...
متن کاملA History of Quantification
Aristotle (384–322 BC), the founder of the discipline of logic, also founded the study of quantification. Normally, Aristotle begins a topic by reviewing the common opinions, including the opinions of his chief predecessors. In logic, however, he could not adopt the same strategy; before him, he reports, “there was nothing at all” (Sophistical Refutations 183b34–36). Aristotle’s theory dominate...
متن کامل